PyTorch Bug: Corrupted Tensors After Failed Storage Resize
In the dynamic world of deep learning, frameworks like PyTorch are indispensable tools. They allow us to build, train, and deploy complex neural networks with relative ease. However, like any intricate software, PyTorch can sometimes exhibit unexpected behaviors. One such issue, which we'll delve into, concerns PyTorch tensor shape metadata update failure when storage resize operations encounter problems. This bug can lead to corrupted tensors, often referred to as "Zombie" tensors, and can manifest as segmentation faults or internal runtime errors, causing significant headaches for developers. Understanding this issue is crucial for maintaining the integrity of your tensor operations.
The Unseen Problem: How "Zombie" Tensors Emerge
The core of this bug lies in the way PyTorch handles tensor resizing, specifically when the underlying storage of a tensor is not meant to be resized. PyTorch is designed to be robust, and when you attempt to resize a tensor whose storage is locked (for instance, when it's backed by a NumPy array via set_()), it correctly raises a RuntimeError. The error message is quite clear: "Trying to resize storage that is not resizable." This is the expected and desired behavior – the operation should fail gracefully.
However, the problem arises because this error handling isn't entirely exception-safe. Before PyTorch checks if the storage is resizable, it proceeds to update the tensor's shape and stride metadata. Imagine you're trying to expand a container, but then realize it's a fixed-size box. PyTorch updates its internal records to reflect the intended new size of the container before it discovers the box can't actually hold more. This leaves the tensor in a precarious state: its metadata (like tensor.shape) might indicate a new, larger size, while its actual tensor.storage() remains empty or unchanged, holding zero bytes of data. This disconnect creates what we're calling a "Zombie" tensor – it appears to have dimensions and data, but its memory is either non-existent or inaccessible in a consistent way.
Subsequent attempts to interact with such a corrupted tensor, such as printing it or accessing its elements, can lead to severe issues. The program might crash with a segmentation fault, indicating a low-level memory access violation, or it might throw another internal RuntimeError as PyTorch tries to reconcile the contradictory information about the tensor's size and its actual storage. This inconsistency between the tensor's metadata and its underlying data buffer is the root cause of these crashes. The ideal scenario would be that if a RuntimeError is thrown during a resize_() operation due to locked storage, the tensor's metadata should revert to its original state, ensuring that the tensor remains in a valid, consistent condition. Currently, this strong exception guarantee is not being met, leading to these problematic "Zombie" tensors.
Reproducing the Bug: A Minimal Example
To truly understand and address a bug, being able to reproduce it consistently is key. Fortunately, the PyTorch team has provided a minimal reproduction case that clearly illustrates the problem of PyTorch tensor shape metadata update failure. This example involves creating a tensor with non-resizable storage and then attempting to resize it.
Let's walk through the code:
First, we set up a scenario with non-resizable storage. We create an empty NumPy array and convert it into an untyped PyTorch storage. This locked_storage is intentionally designed to be a fixed-size buffer (in this case, 0 bytes).
import torch
import numpy as np
# Create non-resizable storage (0 bytes)
locked_storage = torch.from_numpy(np.array([], dtype=np.int32)).untyped_storage()
Next, we create a fresh PyTorch tensor, also empty, and then associate it with our locked_storage. The t.set_(locked_storage) line is critical here; it effectively makes our new tensor t point to this fixed-size, non-resizable memory.
# Inject into a fresh tensor
t = torch.tensor([], dtype=torch.int32)
t.set_(locked_storage)
Now comes the crucial part: attempting to resize the tensor using t.resize_(). We provide a new target shape, for instance, (5, 5, 5). According to the expected behavior, this operation should fail because locked_storage cannot be resized. PyTorch should catch this and ideally leave the tensor's metadata untouched.
# Attempt to resize (Expected: Fail, maintain original shape)
# (Actual: Fails, but updates shape to 5x5x5)
try:
t.resize_((5, 5, 5))
except RuntimeError:
pass
The try...except RuntimeError block is there to catch the expected error. However, the bug manifests within this block. As described earlier, even though the RuntimeError is eventually raised, the tensor's shape metadata is updated before the failure is fully processed. This leads to the problematic state.
Finally, we verify the corruption by examining the tensor's properties:
# Verify corruption
print(f"Shape: {t.shape}") # Prints: torch.Size([5, 5, 5])
print(f"Storage: {t.untyped_storage().nbytes()}") # Prints: 0
print(t) # CRASH
When you run this code, you'll observe that t.shape is indeed torch.Size([5, 5, 5]), which is the target size we attempted to set. However, t.untyped_storage().nbytes() remains 0, confirming that no actual data storage has been allocated or is accessible. Attempting to print t at this point is what triggers the crash, either as a segmentation fault or another runtime error, because PyTorch is trying to display a tensor that has a defined shape but no backing data.
This minimal reproduction clearly demonstrates the PyTorch tensor shape metadata update failure and the resulting "Zombie" tensor state, highlighting the need for improved exception safety in tensor resizing operations.
Understanding the Implications and Fixes
The discovery of this bug, where PyTorch updates tensor metadata even when a storage resize fails, leading to corrupted "Zombie" tensors, has significant implications for developers working with PyTorch, especially those dealing with advanced tensor manipulation or integration with other libraries like NumPy. The core issue, as demonstrated, is a violation of the strong exception guarantee. In software engineering, a strong exception guarantee means that if a function or operation throws an exception, the system remains in a state as if the operation had never occurred. All changes made during the operation are rolled back.
In the case of tensor.resize_(), when it fails because the underlying storage is not resizable (e.g., a NumPy array's storage), the strong exception guarantee would imply that the tensor's shape and stride metadata should remain exactly as they were before the resize_() call. However, as the minimal reproduction shows, PyTorch updates this metadata before it confirms the storage issue and raises the RuntimeError. This leaves the tensor in an inconsistent state: it has a new shape, but its storage is still the old, unresized (and likely empty) one. Accessing such a tensor can lead to undefined behavior, including segmentation faults, which are notoriously difficult to debug because they point to low-level memory corruption.
Potential Fixes and Mitigation Strategies
Addressing this bug requires careful modification of PyTorch's internal C++ code. The fundamental fix would involve restructuring the resize_() operation (and potentially other related mutation operations) to perform the storage check before modifying any tensor metadata. This ensures that if the storage is found to be non-resizable, the metadata is never updated in the first place, thus preventing the "Zombie" tensor state.
Here's a conceptual outline of how the fix might look:
- Check Storage Resizability Early: When
resize_()is called, the first step should be to check if the tensor's underlying storage is indeed resizable. This check should happen before any attempt to alter the tensor's shape, stride, or data pointer. - Conditional Metadata Update: If the storage is confirmed to be resizable, then and only then should the metadata (shape, stride, etc.) be updated to reflect the new dimensions.
- Exception Handling: If the storage is not resizable, a
RuntimeErrorshould be raised immediately, without any preceding modification to the tensor's metadata. This upholds the strong exception guarantee.
For developers encountering this issue:
- Avoid Resizing Non-Resizable Tensors: The most straightforward mitigation is to avoid calling
resize_()on tensors whose storage might be non-resizable. If you're usingtorch.from_numpy()or tensors created with.set_()on external buffers, be cautious about resizing them. - Check Tensor Properties: Before performing operations that might fail unexpectedly, you could add checks for
tensor.storage().is_resizable()if such a method were available (note: PyTorch's current API doesn't exposeis_resizable()directly on storage, but the concept is important). A more practical approach is to be mindful of how the tensor was created. - Error Handling and Logging: Implement robust
try...exceptblocks around operations that might involve resizing. Log detailed information when errors occur, including the state of the tensor's shape and storage, to aid in debugging. - Update PyTorch: Keep your PyTorch installation updated. Bugs like this are often discovered and fixed in newer releases. Checking the PyTorch GitHub repository for issue reports and release notes can provide valuable insights.
This issue, while specific, highlights the importance of robust error handling and adherence to software design principles like the strong exception guarantee in complex libraries. By understanding the problem and potential solutions, the PyTorch community can continue to build reliable and powerful deep learning tools.
For more in-depth information on PyTorch's internals and best practices for tensor manipulation, you might find these resources helpful:
- PyTorch Documentation on Tensors: Dive deep into tensor operations and their underlying mechanisms.
- PyTorch GitHub Repository: Explore the source code and track ongoing development and bug fixes.
- NumPy Documentation: Understand how NumPy arrays interact with PyTorch when data is shared.